'Braes of Glenlivet Distillery (The hillside in the valley where the river Livet flows) was built
in 1973 by Chivas Brothers (Seagram Co Ltd) and was used primarily for creating blending
material. It was built to look like a traditional distillery, complete with pagoda, the inside
however was built along the latest insights in distillery management. No malting floors or
storage capacity, all aspects of production done on a single level floor and a small workforce,
one person if necessary made it a very efficient plant. A clean, mean machine so to speak.'

The Braeval distillery (formerly known as Braes of Glenlivet) is one of
the youngest distilleries in Scotland, built in 1973/'74 by Chivas. When
Pernod Ricard bought the distillery in 2001, they wasted no time and
promptly mothballed it in 2002, together with Allt A' Bhainne, Benriach,
(now revived by Billy Walker & friends), Caperdonich and Glen Keith.
Fortunately, Braeval distillery resumed production on July 11, 2008.

It's located in the far south of Speyside, upstream from Tamnavulin
and (the) Glenlivet. In 1975 two stills were added to the existing three
and one more still was installed in 1978. Braeval now has six stills,
two wash stills with internal condensers (capacity 22,000 litres) and
four 'Milton Ball' spirit stills (capacity 10,000 litres), all heated via steam.

1) Braeval claims to be the distillery with the highest elevation in Scotland; 355 meters above sea level.

2) The Braeval distillery was re-designed in 1997 to be operated by a single person, much like Allt A Bhainne.

3) The focus of the Allt-A-Bhainne distillery has always been on the production of malt whisky for Chivas' blends; Braeval also produced malt whisky for blenders outside the Pernod Ricard group.
 

Braes of Glenlivet 8yo 1987/1995 (62.7%, Cadenhead's, D06/87, B07/95, 5cl)
Nose: Ah! Smooth and complex with whiffs of gooseberry. Organics. Polished. Wowie!
Over time it becomes very intriguing with plenty of old sherry and tobacco. Subtle sweetness.
This smells like an old men's club where they have been smoking good cigars for many years.
Taste: Aahh... Sweet and powerful at cask strength, with sherry and smoke. Hint of peat?
It has a few traits that keep it from reaching the 90's - something oily and sandy on the palate.
Score: 87 points - this is another great Braeval but after a while the palate betrays its age.
Still a mighty fine dram, mind you - if you can find any. But then again I haven't had a bad one yet.

Braes of Glenlivet 10yo 1987/1997 (61.8%, Cadenhead's Bond Reserve)
Nose: Big, rich and complex - but not as sherried as some older Cadenhead's expressions I've tried.
Some 'grainy' notes as well - the 'attick of a grain warehouse' variety rather than the paint thinner variety.
Very subtle organics - half a kilometre away from a cow farm. Maybe a distant dash of peat? Water kills it.
Taste: Lovely minty sweetness on the palate at cask strength. Doesn't respond as strongly to water as the nose.
The sweetness combined with a light peppery feeling and a hint of pine worked surprisingly well.
Score: 80 points - recommendable - but just barely.

Braes of Glenlivet 12yo 1989/2001 (62.1%, Cadenhead's, Bourbon Hogshead)
Nose: Extremely rich. Polished. Organics and spices. Smoke. Horse sweat. Apple. Rotting fruit.
With a few drops of water the sweeter elements come forward. Then the organics return.
Taste: Smooth and soft start with a distinct apple flavour. Big sweet centre. Long fruity burn.
Fabulous mouth feel at cask strength. It becomes a little grittier with some water.
Diluted to about 50% it became even grittier and hotter. Winey finish. No improvement.
Score: 88 points - believe it or not, but this is a malt that should be enjoyed at cask strength.
Don't panic - as long as you make sure to take small sips even 62.1% is perfectly drinkable.

Braes of Glenlivet 15yo (43%, Kirsch Import, bottle #328 of 690)
Nose: Faintly sherried, becoming stronger. Cookies? Nice.
Rounder and sweeter with time, but it keeps a relatively low profile.
Taste: Harsh start. A little dusty, but then it brightens up. Liquorice root?
Sherry. Decent burn; quite dry. Sandy. Remains a little bitter in the finish.
Score: 79 points - nice but dim... This malt improves in the glass but it simply has to many little faults in the taste to reach 'highly recommendable' status. It's enticing enough to make me curious about other bottlings, though...

Braes of Glenlivet 15yo 1979/1995 (60.0%, Signatory, Sherry Butt #16040, D6/6/79, B3/95, 1200 Bottles, 5cl)
Nose: Oh, boy - we have a winner... Rich woody & fruity notes. Autumn leaves.
This is a real sherry monster in the style of the 'old' Glendronach 15yo. Lovely.
After a few minutes it has grown much more complex than the 'Dronach ever was.
Incredibly rich with lots of pipe tobacco. Hints of clay and smoke. Powerful.
Taste: Big and sweet - you barely notice that it's 60%. Firm and fruity.
Not as complex as the nose, but sufficiently entertaining on the palate.
Score: 92 points - what a big bad sherry monster! How Macallan should be.
It might scare some people away, but I admire the uncompromising character.

Braes of Glenlivet 17yo 1979/1997 (58.1%, Signatory Vintage, 70cl)
Nose: A deep and powerful sherry symphony. Amazing complexity. Oriental notes.
Starts out with lots of autumn forest notes and keeps developing from there.
And that's before I added water. When I did, the nose became fruitier - but I wouldn't say it improved.
Taste: Very sherried burn, with a peppermint counterpoint. Good wood.
Marzipan in the finish. With water, the finish became too woody and dry.
Score: 87 points - sing Hallelujah! Another amazing discovery. This bottle may have sucked when I opened it, but it didn't suck! A bit like an Aberlour A'bunadh 'avant la lettre'. Hold the water on this one - it's almost perfect as it is.

Braes of Glenlivet 1977 Madeira Wood (43%, Montgomerie's, D. 19/10/1977, B. October 2000, C#100763)
Nose: Very rich! Fruity. Sweet with candied lemon peel and turkish delight.
Taste: Toffee & coffee. A little gritty on the palate. Oaky and winey dry in the finish.
Score: 85 points - but this Madeira Braes needs several tastings before you really get to know it.

These were not all the (official and independent) expressions of Braeval whisky I've tried over the years.
My Track Record used to contain a complete overview of all the single malts I've tried, but when I passed the 2000 malts mark (and the complete whisky list wouldn't fit on two separate HTML pages anymore) I gave up. My Liquid Log still contains my tasting notes on most single malts I've sampled and scored, though. You can find a specific expression through the search box at the top of each distillery profile. The mAlmanac now contains (purely personal) selections of some of the best single malts and the worst whiskies I've tried so far - as well as the ones with the highest 'Bang-For-Your-Buck' value. But those tasting notes and scores only reflect my own, purely personal opinions. On Serge's distillery profile on Whiskyfun you can find another perspective on the whisky made at this distillery. Check out the Malt Maniacs Monitor on Malt Maniacs for my scores on all expressions I've tried so far - and those of almost all the other certified malt maniacs as well. The Malt Maniacs Matrix contains a few thousand single malts that were sampled and scored by at least four different malt maniacs, so you can compare our individual opinions.
 
 

As far as I know, Braes of Glenlivet was never released as a single malt, and it remains to be seen if Chivas will do so in the forseeable future. Just like Allt A'Bhainne, it was designed with 'volume' production for blends like Chivas Regal, Passport & 100 Pipers in mind. I doubt if the 'recipe' for these blends is the same as in 1974 though. For one thing, the Chivas company was still part of the Seagram's conglomerate in those days. The new owners have to work with a new 'portfolio' of malt whiskies; some distilleries are now owned by competitors and others were mothballed or closed alltogether.

So, if you ever spot an official bottling of Braeval or Braes of Glenlivet malt whisky at a liquorist or on eBay, it's probably a fake. And even independent bottlings are hard to find. One of the rare bottles I've managed to obtain in the 1990's was the bottling by Kirsch Import from Germany, depicted at the right. That one was OK (score 79 points), but because so few bottles were ever released (there were just 28 expressions on the Malt Maniacs Monitor in 2008) I'm pretty confident I found the very best of them so far. The Braes of Glenlivet 15yo 1979/1995 (60.0%, Signatory Vintage, Sherry C#16040) scored a whopping 92 points and ended up on my Hit List of all time favourites.
No mean feat for the product of a 'volume' whisky distillery.

So, what's the reason I'm much 'madder' about Braes of Glenlivet than Allt-A' Bhainne? Maybe the design of the stills is different, or perhaps the wood management is approached in another way. Whatever the reason, most Braevals I've sampled so far did score comfortably in the 80's while most Allt A' Bhainne's ended up in the lower 70's or worse - meaning I wouldn't recommend them...

Braeval has a lot of similarities with its 'sister' distillery
Allt A'Bhainne - both were built as efficient plants in the
1970's by the owners of Chivas Brothers (Seagram's at
the time), bought and closed by Pernod in the early years
of the third millennium and re-opened a few years later.
Oddly enough, the single malt from the Braes of Glenlivet
distillery has always appealed more to me than that from
Allt A'Bhainne - even though they're both 'mechanical'. In
the words of fellow malt maniac Michel van Meersbergen;

As for the change of the name from Braes of Glenlivet to Braeval, the people of Seagram's (also owners of THE Glenlivet distillery not far away) were unhappy with many other distilleries in the area using the name 'Glenlivet' in their advertising and on their labels. Before they proceeded with legal actions against competitors that used the phrase 'Glenlivet' in their names or promotion they decided to set the right example with one of their own brands.